* Begin adding support for timeline
* fix some bugs with parser
* fmt
* add error reporting for parser
* add tests for timeline query parser
* add rejection tests for parse
* begin adding support for lists
also run migration before compiling, so schema.rs is up to date
* add sqlite migration
* end adding lists
still miss tests and query integration
* cargo fmt
* try to add some tests
* Add some constraint to db, and fix list test
and refactor other tests to use begin_transaction
* add more tests for lists
* add support for lists in query executor
* add keywords for including/excluding boosts and likes
* cargo fmt
* add function to list lists used by query
will make it easier to warn users when creating timeline with unknown lists
* add lang support
* add timeline creation error message when using unexisting lists
* Update .po files
* WIP: interface for timelines
* don't use diesel for migrations
not sure how it passed the ci on the other branch
* add some tests for timeline
add an int representing the order of timelines (first one will be on
top, second just under...)
use first() instead of limit(1).get().into_iter().nth(0)
remove migrations from build artifacts as they are now compiled in
* cargo fmt
* remove timeline order
* fix tests
* add tests for timeline creation failure
* cargo fmt
* add tests for timelines
* add test for matching direct lists and keywords
* add test for language filtering
* Add a more complex test for Timeline::matches, and fix TQ::matches for TQ::Or
* Make the main crate compile + FMT
* Use the new timeline system
- Replace the old "feed" system with timelines
- Display all timelines someone can access on their home page (either their personal ones, or instance timelines)
- Remove functions that were used to get user/local/federated feed
- Add new posts to timelines
- Create a default timeline called "My feed" for everyone, and "Local feed"/"Federated feed" with timelines
@fdb-hiroshima I don't know if that's how you pictured it? If you imagined it differently I can of course make changes.
I hope I didn't forgot anything…
* Cargo fmt
* Try to fix the migration
* Fix tests
* Fix the test (for real this time ?)
* Fix the tests ? + fmt
* Use Kind::Like and Kind::Reshare when needed
* Forgot to run cargo fmt once again
* revert translations
* fix reviewed stuff
* reduce code duplication by macros
* cargo fmt
* Make a distinction between moderators and admins
And rework the user list in the moderation interface, to be able to run the same action on many users,
and to have a huge list of actions whithout loosing space.
* Make user's role an enum + make it impossible for a moderator to escalate privileges
With the help of diesel-derive-enum (maybe it could be used in other places too?)
Also, moderators are still able to grant or revoke moderation rights to other people, but maybe only admins should be able to do it?
* Cargo fmt
* copy/pasting is bad
* Remove diesel-derive-enum and use an integer instead
It was not compatible with both Postgres and SQlite, because for one it generated a schema
with the "User_role" type, but for the other it was "Text"…
* Reset translations
* Use an enum to avoid magic numbers + fix the tests
* Reset translations
* Fix down.sql
* Theming
- Custom CSS for blogs
- Custom themes for instance
- New dark theme
- UI to choose your instance theme
- Option to disable blog themes if you prefer to only have the instance theme
- UI to choose a blog theme
Also adds a parameter to `md_to_html` to only render inline elements (so that we don't have titles or images in blog descriptions). And moves the delete button for the blog on the edition page.
I still have to update the SQLite migration once others PRs with migrations will be merged.
Also, there will be a problem when you edit a blog while not owning its banner or icon: when validating they will be reset to their default values… I don't see a good solution to this until we have a better way to handle uploads with Rocket (the same is probably happening for articles btw).
And the icon/banner are not federated yet, I don't know if I should add it to this PR or if it can come after?
Fixes#453Fixes#454
Add some support for comment visibility, fix#217
This add a new column to comment, denoting if they are public or not, and a new table linking private comments to those allowed to read them. There is currently no way to write a private comment from Plume.
Git is having a hard time what happened in Comment::from_activity, but most of it is just re-indentation because a new block was needed to please the borrow checker. I've marked with comments where things actually changed.
At this point only mentioned users can see private comments, even when posted as "follower only" or equivalent.
What should we do when someone isn't allowed to see a comment? Hide the whole thread, or just the comment? If hiding just the comment, should we mark there is a comment one can't see, but answers they can, or put other comments like if they answered to the same comment the hidden one do?
Add migration to fix typo
Add support for linking hashtags with posts
Rework tag search page so it says a nicer message than page not found
when no post use that tag
Add new string to translation
The code is divided in three crates:
- plume-common, for the ActivityPub module, and some common utils
- plume-models, for the models and database-related code
- plume, the app itself
This new organization will allow to test it more easily, but also to create other tools that only reuse a little part of
the code (for instance a Wordpress import tool, that would just use the plume-models crate)
