We add clippy as our build — also rectifying the missing `plume-cli` build!
In the next step we follow clippy's advise and fix some of the "simple" mistakes in our code, such as style or map usage.
Finally, we refactor some hard bits that need extraction of new types, or refactoring of function call-types, especially those that thread thru macros, and, of course functions with ~15 parameters should probably be rethought.
* Slightly improve the media experience
- Use a grid to display the list of media
- Add icons for non-image media preview
- Paginate the gallery
- Add links to the gallery in the editor and in the profile settings to make it more discoverable when you need it
Fixes#432
* Allow video and audio tags in SafeString
Otherwise we can't display their preview, nor show them in articles
Also show controls by default for these two elements
* Show fallback images for audio and unknown files, to make them more visible
* Add a new constructor to SafeString when the input is trusted and doesn't need to be escaped.
And use it to generate media previews.
* Make it possible to insert video/audio in articles
* Bump serde from 1.0.82 to 1.0.84
* Bump ructe from 0.5.4 to 0.5.6
* Bump colored from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0
* Bump itertools from 0.7.11 to 0.8.0
* Bump ammonia from 1.2.0 to 2.0.0
* Bump hyper from 0.12.19 to 0.12.20
* Bump serde_derive from 1.0.80 to 1.0.84
* Bump stdweb from 0.4.12 to 0.4.13
* Bump rsass from 0.9.4 to 0.9.6
* Bump failure from 0.1.3 to 0.1.5
* Bump reqwest from 0.9.5 to 0.9.8
* Bump serde_derive from 0.7.1 to 0.8.0
- Use `Result` as much as possible
- Display errors instead of panicking
TODO (maybe in another PR? this one is already quite big):
- Find a way to merge Ructe/ErrorPage types, so that we can have routes returning `Result<X, ErrorPage>` instead of panicking when we have an `Error`
- Display more details about the error, to make it easier to debug
(sorry, this isn't going to be fun to review, the diff is huge, but it is always the same changes)
Add some support for comment visibility, fix#217
This add a new column to comment, denoting if they are public or not, and a new table linking private comments to those allowed to read them. There is currently no way to write a private comment from Plume.
Git is having a hard time what happened in Comment::from_activity, but most of it is just re-indentation because a new block was needed to please the borrow checker. I've marked with comments where things actually changed.
At this point only mentioned users can see private comments, even when posted as "follower only" or equivalent.
What should we do when someone isn't allowed to see a comment? Hide the whole thread, or just the comment? If hiding just the comment, should we mark there is a comment one can't see, but answers they can, or put other comments like if they answered to the same comment the hidden one do?
* Fix some follow issues
Fix not receiving notifications when followed by remote users
Fix imposibility to be unfollowed by Mastodon/Pleroma users (tested only against Pleroma)
* Fix notification on every post
* Fix issues with federation
Send Link instead of Object when emiting Follow request
Receive both Link and Object for Follow request
Don't panic when fetching user with no followers or posts from Pleroma
Reorder follower routes so Activity Pub one is reachable
* Generate absolute urls for mentions and tags
* Verify author when undoing activity by Link
* Count items in database as much as possible
* Fix the tests
* Remove two useless queries
* Run pragma directive before each sqlite connection
* Pragma for tests too
* Remove debug messages
* Add some constraint at database level
Fixes#79 and should fix#201 and #113 as well
* Fix tests
Delete duplicated data before adding constraints (only with Postgres, there is no way to do it with Sqlite with complex constraints like the one we are using)
Remove the constraint on media path
* We don't need to drop the media unique constraint anymore
Because we deleted it
All the template are now compiled at compile-time with the `ructe` crate.
I preferred to use it instead of askama because it allows more complex Rust expressions, where askama only supports a small subset of expressions and doesn't allow them everywhere (for instance, `{{ macro!() | filter }}` would result in a parsing error).
The diff is quite huge, but there is normally no changes in functionality.
Fixes#161 and unblocks #110 and #273
* Add search engine to the model
Add a Tantivy based search engine to the model
Implement most required functions for it
* Implement indexing and plm subcommands
Implement indexation on insert, update and delete
Modify func args to get the indexer where required
Add subcommand to initialize, refill and unlock search db
* Move to a new threadpool engine allowing scheduling
* Autocommit search index every half an hour
* Implement front part of search
Add default fields for search
Add new routes and templates for search and result
Implement FromFormValue for Page to reuse it on search result pagination
Add optional query parameters to paginate template's macro
Update to newer rocket_csrf, don't get csrf token on GET forms
* Handle process termination to release lock
Handle process termination
Add tests to search
* Add proper support for advanced search
Add an advanced search form to /search, in template and route
Modify Tantivy schema, add new tokenizer for some properties
Create new String query parser
Create Tantivy query AST from our own
* Split search.rs, add comment and tests
Split search.rs into multiple submodules
Add comments and tests for Query
Make user@domain be treated as one could assume
* Run cargo clippy on plume-common
Run clippy on plume-common and adjuste code accordingly
* Run cargo clippy on plume-model
Run clippy on plume-model and adjuste code accordingly
* Reduce need for allocation in plume-common
* Reduce need for allocation in plume-model
add a quick compilation failure if no database backend is enabled
* Run cargo clippy on plume-cli
* Run cargo clippy on plume
For now it only generate a "fake" URI for accept follow activities, but it should be possible to get the URI dereferencable later.
Also I don't know if this URI looks ok, I tried to get something kind of future-proof, but I don't really know about the actual URIs conventions.
Closes#313
