* Big refactoring of the Inbox
We now have a type that routes an activity through the registered handlers
until one of them matches.
Each Actor/Activity/Object combination is represented by an implementation of AsObject
These combinations are then registered on the Inbox type, which will try to deserialize
the incoming activity in the requested types.
Advantages:
- nicer syntax: the final API is clearer and more idiomatic
- more generic: only two traits (`AsActor` and `AsObject`) instead of one for each kind of activity
- it is easier to see which activities we handle and which one we don't
* Small fixes
- Avoid panics
- Don't search for AP ID infinitely
- Code style issues
* Fix tests
* Introduce a new trait: FromId
It should be implemented for any AP object.
It allows to look for an object in database using its AP ID, or to dereference it if it was not present in database
Also moves the inbox code to plume-models to test it (and write a basic test for each activity type we handle)
* Use if let instead of match
* Don't require PlumeRocket::intl for tests
* Return early and remove a forgotten dbg!
* Add more tests to try to understand where the issues come from
* Also add a test for comment federation
* Don't check creation_date is the same for blogs
* Make user and blog federation more tolerant to errors/missing fields
* Make clippy happy
* Use the correct Accept header when dereferencing
* Fix follow approval with Mastodon
* Add spaces to characters that should not be in usernames
And validate blog names too
* Smarter dereferencing: only do it once for each actor/object
* Forgot some files
* Cargo fmt
* Delete plume_test
* Delete plume_tests
* Update get_id docs + Remove useless : Sized
* Appease cargo fmt
* Remove dbg! + Use as_ref instead of clone when possible + Use and_then instead of map when possible
* Remove .po~
* send unfollow to local instance
* read cover from update activity
* Make sure "cc" and "to" are never empty
and fix a typo in a constant name
* Cargo fmt
* Implement find_for_comment for notifications
* Delete notifications when deleting a comment
This should tackle #463
* Apply rustfmt
* Implement `find_for_mention` and remove order by from `find_for_comment`
There is no need to order the notifications
* Delete notifications for mentions
* Fix notifications for comments and mentions
Also adds a parameter to `md_to_html` to only render inline elements (so that we don't have titles or images in blog descriptions). And moves the delete button for the blog on the edition page.
I still have to update the SQLite migration once others PRs with migrations will be merged.
Also, there will be a problem when you edit a blog while not owning its banner or icon: when validating they will be reset to their default values… I don't see a good solution to this until we have a better way to handle uploads with Rocket (the same is probably happening for articles btw).
And the icon/banner are not federated yet, I don't know if I should add it to this PR or if it can come after?
Fixes#453Fixes#454
- Use `Result` as much as possible
- Display errors instead of panicking
TODO (maybe in another PR? this one is already quite big):
- Find a way to merge Ructe/ErrorPage types, so that we can have routes returning `Result<X, ErrorPage>` instead of panicking when we have an `Error`
- Display more details about the error, to make it easier to debug
(sorry, this isn't going to be fun to review, the diff is huge, but it is always the same changes)
Add some support for comment visibility, fix#217
This add a new column to comment, denoting if they are public or not, and a new table linking private comments to those allowed to read them. There is currently no way to write a private comment from Plume.
Git is having a hard time what happened in Comment::from_activity, but most of it is just re-indentation because a new block was needed to please the borrow checker. I've marked with comments where things actually changed.
At this point only mentioned users can see private comments, even when posted as "follower only" or equivalent.
What should we do when someone isn't allowed to see a comment? Hide the whole thread, or just the comment? If hiding just the comment, should we mark there is a comment one can't see, but answers they can, or put other comments like if they answered to the same comment the hidden one do?
* Fix some follow issues
Fix not receiving notifications when followed by remote users
Fix imposibility to be unfollowed by Mastodon/Pleroma users (tested only against Pleroma)
* Fix notification on every post
* Fix issues with federation
Send Link instead of Object when emiting Follow request
Receive both Link and Object for Follow request
Don't panic when fetching user with no followers or posts from Pleroma
Reorder follower routes so Activity Pub one is reachable
* Generate absolute urls for mentions and tags
* Verify author when undoing activity by Link
* Count items in database as much as possible
* Fix the tests
* Remove two useless queries
* Run pragma directive before each sqlite connection
* Pragma for tests too
* Remove debug messages
All the template are now compiled at compile-time with the `ructe` crate.
I preferred to use it instead of askama because it allows more complex Rust expressions, where askama only supports a small subset of expressions and doesn't allow them everywhere (for instance, `{{ macro!() | filter }}` would result in a parsing error).
The diff is quite huge, but there is normally no changes in functionality.
Fixes#161 and unblocks #110 and #273
* Run cargo clippy on plume-common
Run clippy on plume-common and adjuste code accordingly
* Run cargo clippy on plume-model
Run clippy on plume-model and adjuste code accordingly
* Reduce need for allocation in plume-common
* Reduce need for allocation in plume-model
add a quick compilation failure if no database backend is enabled
* Run cargo clippy on plume-cli
* Run cargo clippy on plume
The code is divided in three crates:
- plume-common, for the ActivityPub module, and some common utils
- plume-models, for the models and database-related code
- plume, the app itself
This new organization will allow to test it more easily, but also to create other tools that only reuse a little part of
the code (for instance a Wordpress import tool, that would just use the plume-models crate)
